Ossie uses a reed switch. A mechanical switch is a parametric
oscillator due to the dielectric air gap (in between the poles of that
switch) vary their dielectric spacing, and hence their capacitance, over
time.
This, plus his use of a dead bank of batteries to convert reactive power
into usable power makes this a viable method of synthesizing
electricity from its constituent ingredients of magnetism,
electrostatics and variations of either or both over time.
--------------------------
A set of brushes on a DC motor are parametric if their voltages sparking
across their air gaps (at the commutator) varies over time. This is the
equivalence of a dielectric parametrically varying its capacitance over
time. But in this case, its the byproduct of capacitance, namely: the
voltage charges on either side of a capacitor's dielectric, which is
varying rather than the dielectric's capacitance. The end result is the
same: parametric excitation.
It is the dead battery turned around (in reverse) which is creating this
variation of voltages across the DC motor's sparking air gapped set of
brushes in its commutator. This inversion of batteries, paired with
batteries #1 and #2, creates a conflict of voltages which vary -- either
over time, or else simultaneously -- and is the direct equivalence of a
varying dielectric.
Although a coil of wire is also capable of parametrically varying its
induction over time, it is not overunity. For the dimensionality of a
transverse wave's induction is strictly confined to space while the
dimensionality of capacitance is inversely proportional to space since
longitudinal waves only exist in counter-space.
A longitudinal electric wave may only travel in counter-space.
Transverse waves travel in space. A longitudinal wave "sees" its
distance across the dielectric of a capacitor as being inversely
proportional to the same distance it must travel across a capacitor's
dielectric in space.
While, by comparison, the transverse wave in a wire, or more poignantly
in a coil, must travel the same distance in space as it does in space.
In other words, we build our circuits in space and so we have space as
our reference frame. And transverse (electromagnetic) waves hang out
with us in our world of preferred references.
But longitudinal waves hang out in counter-space wherein their
dimensionality is inverted from our's, and transverse wave's, spatial
characteristic. In other words, in space, speed is distance traveled
over time, while in counter-space, speed is time over distance traveled.
This is why Ohms Law is also inverted whenever we consider the negative
of resistance as compared to its more familiar variety of positive
resistance, aka: Ohms Law becomes Mho's Law (or, Siemens) when positive
resistance becomes negative in a spark gap or in a gas discharge tube
(such as in a neon bulb or in a fluorescent tube minus its ballast).
This dimensional inversion is what results in faster than the speed of
light rate of traversal of longitudinal waves in counter-space in as
much as this is an illusion. Nothing actually travels faster than the
speed of light. It just looks that way since we're taking our
measurements in space while a longitudinal wave travels in counter-space
wherein the distance traveled is not the same as it is in space.
Instead, it's much shorter. So much so, that the conversion of a
longitudinal wave back into an equally energetic transverse wave makes
it appear as if the time between the conversion of a transverse wave
(existing here in space) into its longitudinal equivalent prior to its
embarkation through the medium of counter-space followed by its
returning to its transverse format passes a reduced quantity of time
from which we falsely conclude that the speed of a longitudinal wave
travels faster than the speed of a transverse light beam traveling in
space. This illusory inversion becomes accentuated the greater is the
distance in space (which the longitudinal wave cannot travel in) since
the equivalent distance in counter-space is reduced. This only happens
in the dielectric of a capacitor or the dielectric of capacitance in
general occurring in other circumstances, such as: across sparking air
gaps, or the vacuum of a vacuum tube or in outer space, or across
bedrock deep underground.
For example, Tesla experimented bouncing a longitudinal wave off the
moon and recorded an increase to the speed of light by a factor of
fifty, or 5,000%, while Eric Dollard recorded a mere 26% increase over
the spatial distance of a few thousand feet back in the 1980s while
conducting his
analog computer experiments with the assistance of Peter Lindemann and Thomas Brown.
Newton's Cradle is a perfect analogy to why, and how, a transverse wave
must convert into a longitudinal wave in order to pass through a
compressed medium (such as: bedrock), or a tsunami sound wave traveling
through the depths of the ocean, or an electric wave traveling through
the equivalent medium of compression, namely: a vacuum, before a
longitudinal wave converts back into a transverse wave upon exiting the
compressed (or vacuous) medium which it traveled through.
This apparent increase to the speed of light across the dielectric of a
capacitor -- or an air gap across a sparking commutator brush in a DC
motor -- also manifests an increase in energy. This, too, is an
illusion, (although a happy illusion) for our senses and our meters will
not know any different, nor will our electric bill! Since the Laws of
Physics (to date) only deal with spatial considerations, free energy may
appear to defy Physics. Yet, their vernacular does consider this
possibility. They call it Quantum Mechanics rather than the Aether. And
there is a body of knowledge already behind parametric oscillations of
the mechanical variety with its electrical equivalent lagging not far
behind...
Parametric Excitation and Oscillation of both the Electrical and Mechanical Realms
This leads me to strongly conclude, what I have been (recently) weakly suspecting, that:
parametric oscillation or excitation is the *only* method for producing overunity in 'free energy' devices and methods.
And since (now) I have a direct relationship equating reactive power
with the populist alternative notion of radiant power -- along with
various techniques for reclaiming the wasted current and voltage of
reactive waves getting out of phase which each other, namely: the poor
man's reactive converter of a fully sulfated, dead, lead-acid battery
(or, a synchronous generator/motor), then it is safe to assume that the
broad topic of 'free energy' is actually a simple matter for anyone to
attempt the analysis of.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinyasi
|