Assuming that the resonant frequencies are ignored (as being irrelevant to these series of questions), and assuming the application of the rule of thumb that a source must supply the load/s with a quantity of energy which is calculated to be their requirement/s plus an amount equal to whatever energy could be lost?
And the consequence of the application of this rule of thumb is that the source ends up regulating (insuring) the outcome by suppressing the positive feedback of reactance (aka, the increase of impedance is suppressed)?
Had the input voltage been kept low, on the orders of nano watts or pico watts of its overall delivery, then the real portion of circulating energy would diminish (per thermodynamic rundown and damping) while the imaginary/reactive portion will continuously redefine the field of reactances associated with each reactive component and, thus, each cycle or half-cycle of oscillation will recycle the inductive and capacitive reactances from each prior cycle or half-cycle as the new values of inductance/s and capacitance/s for the next cycle or half-cycle? Thus, parametric amplification may be possible without physically varying the reactive components, but by varying the imaginary portion of their complex fields?
Do we live in a well-regulated society to which electrical engineers are heavily subjected to this scheme (of regulation and stability), or else they wouldn’t get paid if they did not monitor and control the electric utility grid (for example) by supplying sufficient voltage to suppress runaway reactances depleting or exploding the grid (in its various sublocations = resulting from “an imbalanced load”)?
In other words, the regulation of inductances and capacitances within the utility grid is not the only method which is employed to regulate the grid? There may be another unsung hero which is the application of sufficient voltage to uphold the ideology of the Conservation of Energy as a Law so as to obliterate any awareness that it is merely a practical rule of thumb under present circumstances?
So, the application of voltage in quantities sufficient to suppress over-reactance beyond input energies ensures the haughty attitude that Conservation of Energy is a Law rather than a useful rule of thumb?
Runaway reactance could also bleed nearby energy sources dry and upset the airwaves which is one more reason to suppress it within a society which does not foster self-reliance, yes? {I’ve seen this happen so many times whenever the reactive voltage drastically exceeds the real voltage in a simulated circuit.} This is probably due to the proximity between us discourages this variety of self-reliance, yes?
Had this Earth been sparsely populated, this indulgence of mine might have become more popular? And we’d know about one of the Ammann brothers (C. Earl Ammann) because he would not have been arrested for “stealing energy from the grid” and never hearing about what he accomplished a century ago? He incorporated the use of iron in all of the coils of their device so as to maximize their remanence and minimize their inductive losses? They did employ the use of copper, in the format of copper tubing and spheres, but a minimal usage so as to take advantage of copper’s tendency to encourage capacitive reactance but avoid copper’s tendency to be a poor method of preserving the magnetic field surrounding current?