== Block Diagram ==
[[File:Oscillations of Radiant Energy due to throwing away most of the input..png|alt=Oscillations of Radiant Energy|thumb|left|Fig. 1a – Oscillations of Radiant Energy due to throwing away most of the input and prohibiting the formation of current (within this circuit) by disallowing an exit (to avoid counter-balancing its inlet). For neophyte designers of overunity circuits, there should be only one inlet doubling as its own outlet.]]
[[File:Tesla_wireless_power_theory_-_Electrical_Experimenter_Feb_1919.png|thumb|alt=Tesla wireless power theory - Electrical Experimenter Feb 1919.|Fig. 1b – Tesla wireless power theory - Electrical Experimenter Feb 1919.]]
Consider a circuit whose source voltage has merely one of its terminals connected to a circuit (constituting its input) while the other terminal (of this source of voltage) is connected to ground and there is no other ground connected to this style of circuit design (for the purposes of this hypothetical discussion, please see: Fig. 1a on the left and compare it with Tesla's design, Fig. 1b, on the right).
This configuration (of the terminal connections of a source of voltage feeding a circuit) discourages the manifestation of current which normally flows ''into'' a circuit through one portal and flows ''out'' through another portal. Instead, a restriction of portals to merely ONE (in addition to severely restricting the input power) encourages breathing without flow, namely: the circuit manifests a standing wave in which the voltage and the current are out of phase by one-half cycle of oscillations. In other words, whenever the peak of voltage bounces off of the periphery of this type of circuit, the peak of current is crossing its imaginary center. During the subsequent half-cycle, the inverse occurs in which the peak of current echoes off of the periphery at the same moment that the peak of voltage crosses the center. This creates an expansion, followed by a contraction, but not in the real world of physicality since the incentive for expansion (voltage potential) and the execution of same (its movement which reflects a flow of current) occur at opposing halves of each cycle of breath (so to speak)!
All of this occurs within the complex field surrounding reactive components.
Although a circular pathway is avoided that would lead from a “source” to a “load” and then, back to the same “source”, circular pathways are encouraged within the body of this style of circuitry so long as the various subcircuits are electrically isolated from each other with merely a mutual inductance between them, and/or a single wire of electrical connection without any return path. These electrically isolated, open pathway, subcircuits perform very well if they interconnect via several mutual inductances to make up for their lack of electrical connectivity.
[[File:Greek_cross.svg|alt=Greek cross.|thumb|left|A simple four-arm cross symbolizing four open transmission lines emanating from out of a commonly located, central node.]]
[[File:Ankh-symbol cubic.svg|alt=An ankh-symbol is a cubic spline.|thumb|An ankh-symbol is a [https://towardsdatascience.com/cubic-splines-the-ultimate-regression-model-bd51a9cf396d cubic spline] in which three of the straight-arms are symbolic of open transmission lines while the fourth top-most crossarm is representative of a shorted transmission line which loops back upon itself.]]
This situation is best described as when '''an open IDEAL[[https://www.quora.com/profile/Jeffrey-Denenberg Jeffrey Denenberg's] answer to: [https://www.quora.com/When-an-open-transmission-line-is-terminated-by-a-shorted-transmission-line-do-they-produce-a-purely-imaginary-impedance-at-their-input-Can-this-reactance-grow-at-exponential-rates-if-input-is-kept-extremely-small/answer/Jeffrey-Denenberg?__filter__=all&__nsrc__=notif_page&__sncid__=33092740614&__snid3__=44479886759 When an open transmission line is terminated by a shorted transmission line, do they produce a purely imaginary impedance at their input? Can this reactance grow at exponential rates if input is kept extremely small and restricted to a single moment?] on Quora] transmission line is terminated by one (or more) [[Free_Energy_does_not_Exist#Anomalous_Kirchhoff_Behavior|shorted IDEAL transmission line/s]]''' encouraging the formation of a ''purely imaginary impedance at the input''.[[[w:Reflections_of_signals_on_conducting_lines#Applications|Reflections]] cause several undesirable effects, including modifying [[w:Frequency_respone|frequency responses]], causing [[w:Overcurrent|overload]] power in [[w:Transmitter|transmitters]] and [[w:Overvoltage|overvoltages]] on [[w:Power_line|power lines]]. ''However, the reflection phenomenon can also be made use of in such devices as [[w:Stub_(electronics)|stubs]] and [[w:Quarter_wave_impedance_transformer|impedance transformers]].'' The special cases of open circuit and short circuit lines are of particular relevance to stubs.] [[https://ufile.io/3pbinpmr Zip compressed file] of three Micro-Cap simulated variations of this phenomenon. All of them produce similar results despite the use of three galvonic-style batteries in one version versus not in the other two versions. Peruse [http://vinyasi.info/mhoslaw/Parametric%20Transformers/2022/Nov/?C=M;O=D this directory] on my website (as an alternative to downloading this ZIP compressed file) and hunt for any filename which begins with ''simplest-overunity-circuit-you-will-ever-see__''.] [[http://vinyasi.info/patent/pri-vate/Burying%20our%20Overunity%20Circuits%20to%20Eliminate%20their%20Electrostatic%20Buildup.pdf Is it Possible to Generate Current without Voltage?] – (posted to my website)] [[https://electricalscience.quora.com/Impedance-is-a-Source-of-Energy-Accessing-free-energy-is-a-matter-of-determining-where-to-look-for-it-Its-sitting-rig Impedance is a Source of Energy] – Quora]
[[File:Mu-metal cable.svg|thumb|left|Mu-metal cable]]
Yet, this ideal condition[ is not a fantasy. A bygone era of inventors][Nathan Stubblefield used two parallel wires, one of copper and one of iron, wrapped around the central core of his Earth Battery which he [https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/de/5d/14/a57ffad14ccd94/US600457.pdf patented in 1898]] [ utilized magnetic remanence to preserve the magnetic field (which surrounds current) by incorporating the use of ferromagnetic materials wrapped around bare copper cable (placed directly underneath its insulation) over a hundred years ago (please see the figure of a Mu-metal cable, below-left) to prevent distortion/dispersion of the dots and dashes of the Morse code which was being sent across newly laid [[w:Heaviside_condition#Practical_use|trans-Atlantic telegraph cable in the mid-1800s]]. We no longer use this method (probably) so as to avoid eddy currents and the inductive heating which ensues? Instead, we promote the use of copper or aluminum cable both of which lack the ferromagnetic preservation of current.
There is no limit to how much mass of ferromagnetic material can be added to a circuit to preserve its current from thermodynamic losses since magnetic coupling can extend this illimitable mass to the area immediately adjacent to a circuit's coils.
Bill Lyne quotes Nikola Tesla in his book, entitled: “Pentagon Aliens”, as having said: ''For every 200 pounds of iron which was magnetically coupled to [https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/39272/pg39272-images.html#Page_486 Tesla's Special Generator], one horsepower was increased at its output.''][[https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/pentagonaliens/pentagonaliens08.htm Pentagon Aliens, Chapter VIII: A Taste of Other Energy Secrets] – Quote: ''“… for every 200 pounds of iron connected to the device, a full horsepower was added to it.”'']
This style of circuit design (which I am espousing) tends to make it very easy to manifest an inversion of current 180 degrees out of phase with voltage. This inversion of current is oftentimes mistaken for its homologue of the “negation of resistance” which is mathematically equivalent, but not very educational.[[http://vinyasi.info/ne?startCircuit=negresist.txt An example of negative resistance] simulated in Paul Falstad's circuit simulator (mirrored copy).]
A more accurate description would be the ''negation of reactive voltage divided by impedance'', namely:
This leads to another, more traditional, version of Ohm’s Law in which Power equals Voltage Squared Divided by Resistance: .
That conventional version is vague and incorrect in so far as it does not distinguish what is occurring, namely, that: Negative Watts is equal to the Application (the Input) of Real Voltage times its Resultant Output of Reactive Voltage divided by various Impedances (both Real and Imaginary) within a framework of time ...
:
Granted, this is a more convoluted restatement of Ohm's Law with the distinct advantage of sidestepping the conventional claim of physics in which: “Energy IN equals Energy OUT” by (instead) implying that: “Real Voltage IN ''cannot equal'' Reactive Voltage OUT”. The resulting reaction of output voltage '''must be''' greater than, or less than, input voltage irrespective of thermodynamics. This is in contradistinction to conventional wisdom since (my perspective is that) the input is complex and the output is also complex ''all the time'' (a real value plus or minus an imaginary value). In fact, all circuits possess some reactance in proportion to some non-reactance. This is why I deem the traditional presentations of Ohm's Law flawed (in principle) while maintaining a more practical approach for technicians by avoiding a fundamental teaching of how electricity behaves.
Without this fundamental understanding, no one will appreciate Free Energy since they will lack a robust understanding of electricity. I challenge everyone, who desires an understanding of Free Energy, to return to basics and rethink what we've been taught. Ergo, current is a fiction. It is a mathematical shorthand notation replacing something slightly more complicated.
Fig. 1b suggests a similarity to Fig. 1a. Both images possess a singular inlet for power resulting in a periodic variation of potential occurring everywhere, simultaneously, and without any manifestation of conventional current (subject to entropy) that could delay and reduce (through losses) the transmission of power. On the other hand, the reversal of current (in this wikibook's proposal), produces the inversion of losses, namely: an escalation of gain.
This is similar to if, '''whenever we shop at a market, they pay us to take their groceries instead of charging us! And... Every time we shop, they pay us more than they paid us before while claiming to pay us the same!''' ''{The inverse of deprivation.}'' '''What a trip! With so much abundance, who needs war?'''