Why do we ignore "free energy"?

Because we are too preoccupied with energy while ignoring wave patterns.

The generation of energy is distinguished by a wave pattern called: a standing wave. These types of waves are rarely studied. They are the heart and soul of "free energy."

A battery is an example of the conversion of the chemical energy which is stored inside of itself into electrical energy which exits its positive and negative terminals. Hence, it cannot generate energy; it merely converts energy from one format into another format.

The consumption of energy occurs whenever energy is being converted into another format, such as: electrical energy feeding a light bulb is converted into light and is distinguished by a wave pattern which moves. Hence, the battery and the lightbulb inside of a flashlight circuit are not designed with the intention to generate power since that would give its owner a certain degree of freedom from having to purchase anymore power if he can generate his own power which he can't generate with a battery and a lightbulb.

Yet, the arrangement of various electronic components (such as: capacitors and coils of wire, etc.) can sometimes generate power. And simple resistors, such as: heating elements, can convert the generation of this standing, electrical wave energy into useful heat energy and boil water to run a steam locomotive, or replace nuclear power at an electric power plant.

Energy always moves. Wave patterns move if they are merely consuming and converting power. Standing wave patterns do not move even though their energy is moving.

This is a very significant distinction we have been overlooking all this time arguing the pros and cons of free energy: is it a sham, or is it for real?

The theoretical evidence speaks for itself. Simulators are not the last word on this subject. Yet, they cannot be swept aside as rubbish, for that would deny their utilization by electrical engineers orchestrating the design for their new projects.