What is current?

Current is the result of how reactance defines voltage. In other words, voltage can entropically push current or voltage can negentropically pull current. The choice is ours.

Conventional current is defined by the default definition of impedance in which impedance and resistance impede current flow. This is why we conventionally use impedance as a default choice for defining this operation, because it slows down the flow of current.

But there is another definition of electrical reactance which produces a reversal of current to flow away from lower potentials of voltage towards higher potentials of voltage despite the causation of this style of reactance arises from physical impedances and resistances that are being used in a novel manner against our standard expectations.

This alternative definition of reactance also blurs our conventional expectation that the march of time always marches forward. According to Noether’s Theorem, this alteration of time (this shift of time) ignores Conservation. But nobody expects us to be able to reverse the direction of time, so no one investigates this phenomenon of time-reversal any further.

It turns out that time can be “faked” to travel backwards without actually reversing itself yet, still, manage to succeed at negating entropy in the process. In other words, energy (electrical energy in particular), can be convinced that this artificial reversal of time has actually occurred despite it having not occurred at all.

This fakery occurs because this reversal of time is due to our misunderstanding of what spawns our observation of this reversal.

Time “appears” to reverse because the magnitude of the input of (electrical) energy is severely reduced to the point of it being no different than levels of energy of the background of environmental levels, such as: living creatures, etc.

The second reason for this fakery is that the magnitude of the output does not reflect the input; it is not linear.

The third reason is that the frequency of this output is also not the same as the input, nor is it proportionally similar.

The fourth reason is that the waveform of this output is not the same as the waveform of its input. Instead of a nice curvaceous sine wave, the output cannot be plotted except for its peak and trough data points. This puts into question what mysterious operation is taking place in between input and output to cause such a drastic alteration of what should expectantly be far simpler and more straightforward.

The net result of reasons #1 through #3 is that we use the input conditions for our reference to judge the output conditions and erroneously conclude that time has traveled backwards. This condition can occur during a transient surge when a circuit is initially energized, and voltages are at an all-time high relative to current flow as if to imply that the circuit is trying desperately to overcome its inertial impedances and resistances. And if the circuit is designed with the intention to take advantage of the properties of “free energy”, then it can produce a transient whose instantaneous power – when divided by its power per unit of time (or vice versa) – yields a negative quotient.

This negative quotient indicates a negative time interval and, thus, indicates a reversal of time.

But what is really happening is that a parasitic oscillation has been spawned composed of pure imaginary power. This imaginary power (predicated upon the square root of negative one) is not the result of a conversion of a real power input into an imaginary output. For, if that were the case, entropy would dominate the behavior of the circuit. This is conventional wisdom.

Instead, pure imaginary power is entering the circuit from the field of imaginary numbers without any disappearance of some of the real power input also taking place to produce a complex equivalency which honors the Conservation of Energy. This field of imaginary numbers is the numeric qualification of the Aether in that this field has no location in space and no internal dimensions. Thus, we cannot measure its energetic content. We can’t even take a guess. All we can do is take advantage of its operational benefits by including it (in its pure form) within the designs of our “free energy” circuits.

This imaginary power has no analog with its conversion from real power. Real power merely initiated its inclusion without directly converting into it and thus cannot directly account for it, which is what Conservation expects.

Thus, this “gift” of imaginary power possesses no ties to real power. And having no ties, it is purely imaginary without being a mere member of complex power. Complex power has ties to entropy due to its real power component coexisting with its imaginary component. But pure imaginary power - when injected from the Aether - has no ties to complex power and, thus, has no ties to entropy. It can grow, through self-amplification, in a circuit which is an electrical equivalent to an echo chamber until simple resistances or conventional impedances produce enough heat to fry the circuit into its self-destruction if this growth rate is not regulated.

All of this - in combination with the fact that the input frequency is less than the parasitic outcome - causes an error of judgement in which we erroneously conclude that time has proceeded backwards. In reality, the proper way to analyze this apparent reversal is by way of an analogy in which we travel along a road in our motor vehicles.

If we pass a slower moving vehicle, then we avoid the erroneous conclusion that they are moving backwards due to our simultaneous awareness that the ground and our surroundings are also moving forward. This causes us to re-evaluate the overly simplified conclusion of the slower vehicle moving backwards into a modified conclusion that they are moving forward at a slower pace to ourselves.

This is what is happening with a parasitic oscillation spawning (what will eventually) become a magnitude which is greater than the input. The input of real power remains subject to entropic losses while the parasitic oscillation of pure imaginary power engages the negentropy of time reversal increasing (rather than diminishing) its magnitude.

Frequency is the only way energy can measure its passage of time. It has no other recourse. It cannot know what a clock is. And, anyway, a clock is a frequency by which we judge energetic fluctuations of amplitude over a span of time resulting in our conclusions of its time interval. This is our imposition of our observation projected upon the energetic fluctuations as if we knew what conclusion is best. Yet, the perspective of energy may be vastly different. It may observe no alteration of its march of time and, thus, uphold Conservation from within the context of its point of view. Thus, negentropy only appears to be suffering from time reversal from a point of view lying outside of the energy which is undergoing this diagnosis. And this constitutes our false conclusion (of time-reversal) as a byproduct of our externalized point of view.

Since it doesn’t matter whether or not time actually reverses itself - that it only matters that electrical energy is convinced that time has indeed reversed itself, then negentropy will occur.

And if negentropy can be sustained, or if its consequence of self-amplification can be sustained, then “free energy” is indeed a theoretical possibility and has been so all along despite it coming or going out of fashion as if it were a “fad”.

This has been my experience over the past nine years conducting countless simulations of electrical circuits.

My understanding is due to what the internet has provided me with, namely: the application of the formalized training of professionals (which I lack) and the integration of their expertise into my perspective.