This is an attempt to replicate Tesla's TriMetal Generator and the Atmospheric Generator of the Ammann brothers may be one and the same invention.
Mho's Law mathematically justifies free energy and defines the limited jurisdiction of the Conservation of Energy Law which exclusively pertains to Ohm's Law and the consumption of real power. The Conservation of Energy Law does not pertain to the generation of reactive power.
Voltage sources do not generate real power. They merely generate reactive power due to the definition of the conventional polarity assigned to the electric charge of an electron versus the polarity assigned to the voltage difference between the two terminals of a voltage source.
Only electrical loads consume real power. Thus, only appliances come under the authority of the Conservation of Energy Law by requiring that their reception of real power must equal their exportation of their conversion of this inception of energy into some other format. For instance, an appliance may receive real power, but must convert an equal amount of light, or heat, or mechanical motion, etc, in order to satisfy its operation under the Conservation Law and Ohm's Law.
The reactance formulae of capacitive and inductive reactance regulates the rate of the formation of free energy while Mho's Law justifies it.
This is not new information. This is ancient knowledge and hidden in plain sight for over a century.
Only by a segregated analysis of every single electrical component within a circuit can we come to know what is happening.
It is not enough to know how much energy goes into a circuit versus how much comes out of it. We must also know which components of a circuit are participating in the production of reactive power versus which components are consuming real power. Then, we can do a tally of the net power to determine whether the circuit is a generator of reactive power, or a consumer (aka, a converter) of real power.
The results will amaze you!
The text of my provisional patent application, below, follows a format analogous to Euclid's Axioms in which a simple premise serves as the foundation for whatever follows, namely: the conventional nomenclature of physics has decided to assign a negative polarization of sign to the charge state of an electron, plus we have casually accepted the convention of labeling the voltage difference between the two terminals of a battery as having a positive polarity of sign.
The summary of my provisional patent is a synopsis of the mathematical definition for free energy's existence. It is founded upon Ohm's Law and its derivation is non-intuitive without the math to spell it out. It restricts the jurisdiction of the Conservation of Energy and makes super-conductance possible at room temperature.
The summary does not display all of the data behind this premise. I reserve that more fuller display for my two volume set, entitled: "Mho's Law Justifies Free Energy."
The summary merely serves as an introduction to this unique treatment of this topic.
Here are two versions of summaries of my provisional patent application, the kindle version is for viewing while the print version is for printing, and both are in PDF format...
An Overview of Mho's Law, kindle.pdf Shortcut redirect URL... https://is.gd/urinag An Overview of Mho's Law, large print.pdf Shortcut redirect URL... https://is.gd/idakey
Here is the text of my provisional patent application, filed: 14 July 2021 - 63/221,840, in PDF format...
Mho's Law Justifies Free Energy, text, vol. 1 of 2 Shortcut redirect URL... https://is.gd/ixabub Mho's Law Justifies Free Energy, figures, vol. 2 of 2 Shortcut redirect URL... https://is.gd/econut
Here is a very short synopsis of Free Energy in PDF format...